Wow, now that's a pile of feedback!

Adding on to what John already replied to....
FootlessYeti, on 08 April 2012 - 11:14 PM, said:
"The trainwreck that is Star Wars Kinect continues." xD I share your hatred for that crap, Tom.
*Internet high five*
Smurfetta, on 08 April 2012 - 11:43 PM, said:
Thanks so much for mentioning The Weekly Planetarium. It's hilarious that we mention you mentioning us mentioning you and so on and so forth. We love your show and really appreciate all of your support. We are also thrilled that everyone is satisfied with the newsletter each week, we just want feedback because without feedback we can't make changes to make it better. So any and all feedback is welcome and when I heard you tell your listeners to give any feedback they may have, that was very kind of you!
We're happy to help! And somehow I think we've managed to not mention your name when talking about the Weekly Planetarium. Uh, OOPS. Sorry!

We'll definitely address that next time. Regardless, though, nice job on the newsletter! It really is one of our favorite things to read every week.
Smurfetta, on 08 April 2012 - 11:43 PM, said:
I'm involved with several projects on this site and was wondering if you could talk about some of them. I will post one of my projects each week or once every other week and if you can fit it in and you don't mind, I would greatly appreciate it if you could talk about it.
amazingflyingpoo, on 09 April 2012 - 07:26 AM, said:
Please do send me information about a project, and it is a good idea that you send me info about one project per podcast probably. We could talk about more, but it would make more sense to just focus on one instead of just reading off one after another and not having time to actually talk about them.
Yep, we would LOVE to include that information in our podcasts. Thanks Smurfetta!
ShamgarBlade, on 09 April 2012 - 12:26 AM, said:
I can't express how much I appreciate this podcast. It is such a joy for me to listen to people who have the same passion for LBP that I do! Although LBP may be a monster, I think we can all agree that this monster is worth embracing. I look forward to your podcasts every week and I love the fact that it's more of a discussion between friends rather than a news report. It always gives me something to think about for the week and hearing your excitement for everything LBP reassures me that this is truly the greatest gaming community around.
Thanks guys.

Aw shucks... Thanks Shamgar. I can't tell you how much we appreciate you appreciating the podcast and the way that we appreciate the appreciative community. We really appreciate it! It's
awesome.
Trindall, on 09 April 2012 - 01:22 AM, said:
It was great fun to hear Ria and a great shame that we only get to hear half of her part as it would have enjoyable to get more of her interaction during the beginning segments. Thanks for being on the episode Ria, you really brought life and charm to an otherwise, uh, adequate podcast.

LOL I was thinking
exactly that while I was editing together the news. "Phew, I'm glad we have Ria on in the next section!"
Trindall, on 09 April 2012 - 01:22 AM, said:
So in addition to the ongoing Kinect Star Wars gags you now have the 'Awesum' prohibition. By the time you reach episode 20 it'll all just be a stand-up routine with the two of you driving from one meme to the next.
amazingflyingpoo, on 09 April 2012 - 07:26 AM, said:
LOL! I am looking forward to that episode 20 where it is pure PMP jokes so that it is impossible to pick up any new listeners :-P
Yep, that's our long-term plan for this podcast. The synopsis for episode 20 will be something like:
"Ebelskivers are my toilet dragons."
"Awesome!" {ding!}
*squeeeeek*
Trindall, on 09 April 2012 - 01:22 AM, said:
What about a link to
Sacko-Mart: Banana of Doom in the list of links? Ria did out the account and level name and we all know that a large amount of the listeners will be running out to play it. Sounds like a fun ride and I've got it queued up.
GREAT suggestion!

I don't know why we didn't think of that.
Trindall, on 09 April 2012 - 01:22 AM, said:
Is the progression from tiny-sackboy-in-a-large-world to sackboy-in-a-sackboy-sized-world a result of the players trying to identify with the character on their own terms? Is the original small sackboy a visual create style relic that is uniquely a part of LBP1 and ignored or lost in LBP2?
Love it! Added.